|
Introduction
In a country
like India, there are a large number of small scale industries
which desire to acquire ISO-9000 certification to exploit
export opportunities, but shy away from it believing that
it is expensive. It is a fact that any new system being installed
requires the allocation of resources and manpower. The expense
is in reality an investment for returns in the future in terms
of reduction in cost of non-conformance and expanding market
opportunities. To a certain extent the initial burden can
be lightened by what is known as the group or "cluster" approach.
Under such an approach, a number of companies (no more than
10), pool their resources to organise an ISO-9000 implementation
process. The collective approach is possible because designing
an ISO-9000 system does not require the disclosure of proprietary
technological and process information.
Methodology
The methodology of the group approach is described below:
Forming the group
Five to Ten small companies can join together with one company
taking the lead for the process of group learning and using
the knowledge acquired to adopt an ISO-9000 quality system.
Project Planning
A project plan can be prepared jointly, listing the activities
and resources required, by a consensus approach. The presence
of a consultant as a facilitator is desirable. A suitable
person from one of the companies who has good communication
skills and who can be trained as a management representative
or coordinator can be assigned to coordinate the joint activities.
Training
The project's most important aspect is training employees
at all levels starting with the chief executive.
Three differently tailored courses must be visualised for
the senior, middle management and the employees in general
respectively. The senior levels will need policy formulation
guidance, the middle management will need implementation tips
and all levels will need a clause-by-clause understanding
of the Standard. A group of trainers and internal auditors
may also have to be trained in separate courses common to
all companies. The training fees to the consultant may be
shared amongst the companies. The companies may share the
common training venue at an industry association. Group training
has the following advantages:
· The cost per participant is considerably reduced.
· The training is tailored to the needs of the group
· The participants can exchange their experiences during training
and assist each other after the training.
· This group training may make it possible for a trained employee
of one company to act as an internal auditor for another company.
Using new procedures
After developing and documenting the quality system, each
company should test the system for at least three months and
make minor modifications as required in individual companies.
It is then a common date for all companies is fixed for the
official launch of the system.
Overcoming problems
There are likely to be two kinds of problems; one, specific
to each company which each company management can solve and
the other which need to be solved by a common shared approach
with the consultant advice. The chief executives` participation
in such meetings can be very helpful. At least two cycles
of internal audits and corrective actions is desirable.
Pre-assessment
audit
As soon as most companies in the group are ready, a pre-assessment
audit is recommended to be conducted by the experienced consultant.
The result of the audit may have systemic findings and it
simultaneously serves as a dress rehearsal for the certification
audit. The nonconformities found are systemically remedied.
Preparing for
certification
A certification agency may be chosen jointly considering the
type of accreditation required for effective export marketing,
be it UKAS (UK), RVA (Netherlands), RAB (USA) under whose
banner the certificate is needed. The costs of certification
may be negotiated and shared. A consultant will be able to
guide effectively in this process.
Post-certification
Even after certification, the group of companies could continue
to act as a quality improvement club. Experience sharing in
respect of tools of improvement, process benchmarking, joint
procurement of magazines, special training sessions etc.,
can be organised to reap the intended benefits of the system.
The Governments at the Centre and the States have instituted
some incentives like part sharing of the costs on reimbursement
basis, and soft loans from financial institutions.
|